Looks like a winner if you are not burdened with kids!
Surprisingly, got a good wrap up from the September issue of Motor magazine, which is renowned for its heavy bias to GM, should be called General Motor magazine.
I don't know why they compared it to a GM V8 family sedan and then panned it for rear leg room. Running 235x18 tyres that are only just better than wintertreads is also baffling.
I've always said they need to do comparisons with equal brand and size rubber. How many times do they compare automatics to manual cars?
Haven't really been a buyer of this magazine, or Wheels for that matter, for decades, so last year I bought a subscription to both. Fairly unimpressed with both, the writers seem to be impressed with their own self importance.
They are also sadly lacking in mechanical skills and knowledge. The attempt to run 300kph in the last Falcon GT showed a basic stupid mistake when then tried to run the number in the heat of the day when both horsepower and traction are reduced!
Back to the 2015 Mustang, might buy one after the initial rush, it'll be an automatic, I'm just a bit unsure of how good the US unit is. I would have preferred the ZF unit. I'm also glad they are providing them initially without superchargers too, no need for unnecessary complications.
