Stroker cams

Mustang Australia
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Stroker cams  (Read 8763 times)

Offline shaunp

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8496
  • Location: Brisbane
shaunp
Stroker cams
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2008, 05:40:16 pm »
TKO is the answer.
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #26 on: February 22, 2008, 05:43:40 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by shaunp
TKO is the answer.


Thats what I keep telling him but.................;3
Logged

Offline Macka

  • Shelby
  • *********
  • Posts: 6720
  • Vic member 1571
Macka
Stroker cams
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2008, 05:47:05 pm »
66rox,  they are not bad sheets..  getting a little bit more than i can at the moment.  I wonder how it compares to a real run sheet.  

Looks like i'm back on the spanners on the weekend.

Mac
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2008, 05:52:50 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mac1
66rox,  they are not bad sheets..  getting a little bit more than i can at the moment.  I wonder how it compares to a real run sheet.  

Looks like i'm back on the spanners on the weekend.

Mac


Mac , What is your current set up?
Logged

Offline Macka

  • Shelby
  • *********
  • Posts: 6720
  • Vic member 1571
Macka
Stroker cams
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2008, 06:04:14 pm »
Ech, just over 420 cubes, different duration, more juice but am restricted a bit at the moment with only ported heads, HO springs and bigger valves.  New elec. dizzy works well..  Pulls like a 16 y/o school girl though..
Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #30 on: February 22, 2008, 06:06:25 pm »
This your old motor Echo

I don't know how many cfm the webers would flow but more flow than 650 makes little difference to the figures.



Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #31 on: February 22, 2008, 06:14:15 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by shaunp
TKO is the answer.



This is probably a stupid question but whats TKO?
Logged

Offline Macka

  • Shelby
  • *********
  • Posts: 6720
  • Vic member 1571
Macka
Stroker cams
« Reply #32 on: February 22, 2008, 06:42:08 pm »
Not the TKO, .....  just what is the TKO  Chief?
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #33 on: February 22, 2008, 06:55:51 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by 66ROX
Quote
Originally posted by shaunp
TKO is the answer.



This is probably a stupid question but whats TKO?


Tremec.........I have a 3550 which is now replaced by the TKO 500.

Rox......you need to change the manifold type to Individual runners and the cfm's for quad 44's is 3000cfm.

My basic desktop dyno has individual runner option I am sure your dyno program has the same.
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #34 on: February 22, 2008, 06:57:41 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mac1
Ech, just over 420 cubes, different duration, more juice but am restricted a bit at the moment with only ported heads, HO springs and bigger valves.  New elec. dizzy works well..  Pulls like a 16 y/o school girl though..



MMMMMMMMM 420 CUBES............with ported 2v heads?
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #35 on: February 22, 2008, 06:59:06 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by 66ROX
This your old motor Echo

I don't know how many cfm the webers would flow but more flow than 650 makes little difference to the figures.





These windsor snr heads are crap !:[
Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #36 on: February 22, 2008, 10:03:07 pm »
Ok try this for size





Side note:  I leave at 8am Sat so any replies won't be able to answer until I get back in 10 days
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #37 on: February 22, 2008, 10:12:11 pm »
Interesting stuff......Thanks mate.............Oh one more before you go .........................The 1st 347 you did for me, just change the capacity to 289 and please post.:(
Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #38 on: February 22, 2008, 11:09:48 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by echo
Interesting stuff......Thanks mate.............Oh one more before you go .........................The 1st 347 you did for me, just change the capacity to 289 and please post.:(


Here goes as a 289



Logged

Offline Macka

  • Shelby
  • *********
  • Posts: 6720
  • Vic member 1571
Macka
Stroker cams
« Reply #39 on: February 22, 2008, 11:12:31 pm »
They are still pretty high numbers...
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #40 on: February 26, 2008, 09:32:11 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by 66ROX
Quote
Originally posted by echo
Interesting stuff......Thanks mate.............Oh one more before you go .........................The 1st 347 you did for me, just change the capacity to 289 and please post.:(


Here goes as a 289




Other than about 100 extra foot pounds of torque why would you bother spending big $$$ on a 347?:2
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #41 on: March 24, 2008, 02:11:46 pm »
Hey ROX, can you please run this cam with the 347/webers and four barrel 650dp.

Then 289 with four barrel 650dp .

Both with 1.65 rockers. These are the specs of my old cam.

Valve Adjustment 0.022  0.022  
Gross Valve Lift 0.56  0.56  
Duration At 0.015 Tappet Lift 294  294  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Valve Timing At 0.015      
  Open Close
Intake 41  73  
Exhaust 81  33  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
These Specs Are For The Cam Installed At 106 Intake CL
  Intake Exhaust
Duration At 0.05  248  248  
Lobe Lift 0.35  0.35  
Lobe Separation 110  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #42 on: March 24, 2008, 04:17:04 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by 2233
Hey ROX, can you please run this cam with the 347/webers and four barrel 650dp.

Then 289 with four barrel 650dp .

Both with 1.65 rockers. These are the specs of my old cam.

Valve Adjustment 0.022  0.022  
Gross Valve Lift 0.56  0.56  
Duration At 0.015 Tappet Lift 294  294  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Valve Timing At 0.015      
  Open Close
Intake 41  73  
Exhaust 81  33  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
These Specs Are For The Cam Installed At 106 Intake CL
  Intake Exhaust
Duration At 0.05  248  248  
Lobe Lift 0.35  0.35  
Lobe Separation 110  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


347 with webbers



Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #43 on: March 24, 2008, 04:24:42 pm »
347 with dual plane and 650 dp



Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #44 on: March 24, 2008, 04:29:42 pm »
289 with dual plane and 650dp



Logged

Offline 66ROX

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
66ROX
Stroker cams
« Reply #45 on: March 24, 2008, 04:36:28 pm »
I should be getting back my bottom end for my 302 soon. :(
Going to start a thread on the build once I start it.
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #46 on: March 24, 2008, 05:44:38 pm »
Should be good, keep us posted :(
Logged

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #47 on: March 24, 2008, 08:41:22 pm »
Hi Rox

Got another one for you.

450ci, AFR 225 heads, 12.5:1 comp, super victor manifold, 1050 dominator, solid roller

Valve Setting: Intake .020 Exhaust .020 HOT
 
Lift: Intake @Cam 420 @Valve 672 All Lifts are based
on zero lash and theoretical rocker arm ratios.
  Exhaust @ Cam 420 @Valve 672
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.60    
 
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.0205
Lift:   Opens Closes ADV Duration
  Intake 42.0 BTDC 76.0 ABDC 298.0 °
  Exhaust 87.0 BBDC 41.0 ATDC 308.0 °
 
Spring Requirements:   Triple   Dual   Outer   Inner
Part Number 99885
Loads Closed 215 LBS @ 1.950 or 1 61/64
  Open 592 LBS @ 1.320    
 Recommended RPM range with matching components
Minimum RPM 4600
Maximum RPM 8000
Valve Float 8600
 
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.050
Lift:   Opens Closes Max Lift Duration
  Intake 27.0 BTDC 59.0 ABDC 105 266.0 °
  Exhaust 72.0 BBDC 24.0 ATDC 115 276.0 °
Logged

Offline HEVEN67

  • Top Streeter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3769
HEVEN67
Stroker cams
« Reply #48 on: March 24, 2008, 09:07:02 pm »
Hey Dave! I done the sums and it adds up as quite feasible!
Logged
A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend. A successful woman is one who can find such a man.




Real muscle cars have 3 pedals. Where theres smoke theres Tyres

Offline 2233

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
2233
Stroker cams
« Reply #49 on: March 24, 2008, 09:14:33 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by HEVEN67
Hey Dave! I done the sums and it adds up as quite feasible!


What ?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »