260 Windsor Rebuild

Mustang Australia

Author Topic: 260 Windsor Rebuild  (Read 52791 times)

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #100 on: June 02, 2015, 05:18:55 pm »
Ok so visited engine builder had all my parts layed out.

All acid dipped sand blasted etc etc

It appears this 260 has had some work!

Non stocker cam he said as lumps in lobes and triple timing chain. He said cam has done no work as he measured.

Doing - big ends - valves - rings no Pistons - honing and new oil pump - fuel pump - thermostat

Any opinions ?

Offline GLENN 70

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8620
  • Location: Gold Coast .
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #101 on: June 02, 2015, 05:33:59 pm »
Ok he must know what's he is doing .  It must have been in good condition then other than rings and valves .  You should get hardened seats for the heads then while the heads are apart . Crank must be good also but I'm sure he will clean it up too . Should work out a lot cheaper than a total rebuild .

Offline barnett468

  • Cobra
  • *********
  • Posts: 7174
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #102 on: June 02, 2015, 06:48:09 pm »
.
Opinions, yes . . since you are clearly not happy with the way that cam ran, have him index it and give us the info so we know what it is so we can tell you if a different cam will be better for your app.

for the bazillionth time, i would pin the rocker studs, especially now that you know it has a cam that is bigger than stock.

once again, i would get the cylinder and piston measurements from him and post them.

i would have him measure the spring rate and length and give us that along with the installed height distance.

the bottom line is that if you rebuild it exactly the way it is, it will run exactly the way it did when you removed it, and since he claims that from what he has seen so far, it has little wear in it, i for one have absolutely no idea why you took it out in the first place, because unfortunately, it sounds like a waste of money to me at this point.

.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2015, 06:53:54 pm by barnett468 »

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #103 on: June 02, 2015, 06:52:59 pm »
.
Opinions, yes . . since you clearly nit happy with the way that cam ran, have him index it and give us the info so we know what it is so we can tell you if a different cam will be better for your app.

for the bazillionth time, i would pin the rocker studs, especially now that you know it has a cam that is bigger than stock.

once again, i would get the cylinder and piston measurements from him and post them.

i would have him measure the spring rate and length and give us that along with the installed height distance.

the bottom line is that if you rebuild it exactly the way it is, it will run exactly the way it did when you removed it and since he claims that from what he has seen so far, it has little wear in  it so, i for one have absolutely no idea why you took it out in the first place because unfortunately, it sounds like a waste of money to me at this point.

.

Will try get this info

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #104 on: June 12, 2015, 12:37:00 pm »
More info today. Engine ready tomorrow. Valves have been refaced and more air flow added to increase performance. Additive still to be used was recommended.

Offline GLENN 70

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8620
  • Location: Gold Coast .
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #105 on: June 12, 2015, 01:16:19 pm »
You should have done the heads for unleaded  ,not  relied on additive .

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #106 on: June 12, 2015, 01:22:19 pm »
You should have done the heads for unleaded  ,not  relied on additive .

Thought so too but builder said not required use additive lead

Offline barnett468

  • Cobra
  • *********
  • Posts: 7174
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #107 on: June 12, 2015, 01:31:28 pm »
Thought so too but builder said not required use additive lead

well that makes no sense does it? . . if its not required then why does he say you need additive? . . there's a rather big hole in his theory since he's obviously contradicting himself . . no, its not "required" IF you use a band aid like an additive to compensate for not having them.

keep in mind that this band aid additive will now also be going thru the entire top end of your newly rebuilt engine, PLUS the stuff isnt cheap and in the long run, it would probably have worked out cheaper to install the seats in the first place unless he wanted something like $300.00 aud or more to do it.

yes, hardened seats would last 200,000 miles and the seats in your heads will not even with additive . . it used to be that you could grind the orig seats in the heads and still get 120,000 miles out of them running unleaded . . i know this because my friend did it but one of the problems with doing this in the us that due to environmental regulations, we now have gas that has a ton of cleaners in it and this leaves the valves and sears so clean that they microweld themselves to each other which decreases their life . . i have no idea about the gas in oz . . that being said, it is likely that you could reduce this microwelding by dumping a few ounces ot tranny fluid in the gas tank every time you fill it up.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2015, 01:39:00 pm by barnett468 »

Offline dyates

  • mustang tragic
  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
  • NSW member of MOCA.Located Casino
  • Location: Casino.NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #108 on: June 12, 2015, 03:02:55 pm »
I have been following this thread from day dot.To date it goes from bad to worse,get the heads done to run unleaded.Given the specs you have put up 91 would be fine it,s not going to be a street brawler.

By the way the engine guy sounds a bit dodgy,but then again we don't know what you budgeted for and asked for.

Should have bought a crate motor
Black and Gold 66 Hertz Tribute
1966 Coupevertible triple black - Sold

Offline GLENN 70

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8620
  • Location: Gold Coast .
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #109 on: June 12, 2015, 03:49:41 pm »
I don't bother with any additives ,it just  soots up the plugs on short runs .

Offline moe

  • Top Streeter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3327
  • Location: ACT
  • Name: "Moe"
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #110 on: June 12, 2015, 05:32:52 pm »
Thought so too but builder said not required use additive lead

Just remember that you are the customer.  Is he giving you a good deal?

Offline barnett468

  • Cobra
  • *********
  • Posts: 7174
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #111 on: June 12, 2015, 05:45:34 pm »
Ok so visited engine builder had all my parts layed out.

new oil pump - fuel pump - thermostat

Any opinions ?

yes:

carter fuel pump.

180 - 185 thermostat.

joe gibbs break in oil or similar for break in.
.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2015, 05:48:17 pm by barnett468 »

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #112 on: June 12, 2015, 05:57:58 pm »
Just remember that you are the customer.  Is he giving you a good deal?

Moe I wasnt after a good deal I was after a good job and knowledge, his workshop is clean and had modified windsors and Chevy engines being built

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #113 on: June 12, 2015, 05:58:19 pm »
I have been following this thread from day dot.To date it goes from bad to worse,get the heads done to run unleaded.Given the specs you have put up 91 would be fine it,s not going to be a street brawler.

By the way the engine guy sounds a bit dodgy,but then again we don't know what you budgeted for and asked for.

Should have bought a crate motor
Really ?

Offline shaunp

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8496
  • Location: Brisbane
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #114 on: June 12, 2015, 06:16:27 pm »
You should have put hard seats in it, its like $25 per cylinder.

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #115 on: June 12, 2015, 06:23:53 pm »
You should have put hard seats in it, its like $25 per cylinder.

I know but under his guidance as he is the builder and I'm trusting him not that I don't trust your advice Shaun!

He said it's not needed he Refaced and new lifters etc

Offline 68Coupe

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1178
  • MOCA NSW Member
  • Location: Sydney
  • Name: Andrew
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #116 on: June 12, 2015, 07:19:16 pm »
If you're getting an engine rebuild done I'm not sure of a reason why you wouldn't be putting hardened seats in while your doing it? :shrug:  I'd insist on it.

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #117 on: June 12, 2015, 07:22:47 pm »
If you're getting an engine rebuild done I'm not sure of a reason why you wouldn't be putting hardened seats in while your doing it? :shrug:  I'd insist on it.

I know I'm was hoping he would do it but said run 98 octane and additive and it will run forever ...

Offline 68Coupe

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1178
  • MOCA NSW Member
  • Location: Sydney
  • Name: Andrew
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #118 on: June 12, 2015, 07:26:27 pm »
I know I'm was hoping he would do it but said run 98 octane and additive and it will run forever ...

Aren't you the one that's paying him to do the rebuild? If you want it done, tell him that's what you want. Why do you want to be stuffing around with additive?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2015, 09:56:41 am by 68Coupe »

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #119 on: June 12, 2015, 07:31:12 pm »
Aren't you the one that's paying him to do the rebuild? If you want it done, tell him that's what you want! Why do you want to be stuffing around with additive?

I did talk to him about it but felt my knowledge wasn't up to scratch

Offline GLENN 70

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8620
  • Location: Gold Coast .
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #120 on: June 12, 2015, 07:52:31 pm »
If it was my engine I would have done it ( hardened seats ) . Anyway to late now and if the valves are good etc it will be fine as long as its not a Dailey driver . I wouldn't bother will additive unless you drive on a real long trip , 200 Klms  plus at one time then I would put some in . Why did he say 98 fuel surely 95 will be ok unless it has high compression ,ask him what the compression ratio is . It will be fine and good luck with the rest of your venture  :thumb: .

Offline shaunp

  • GT 500
  • *********
  • Posts: 8496
  • Location: Brisbane
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #121 on: June 12, 2015, 09:36:03 pm »
Additive is shit really, it fowls the plugs around town makes them idle rough, waste of time, I wont use it,anymore day to day and I tried it in many cars, Only time I put it in a car is for a high speed running. I dont see the point of not spending the money on hard seats, if you rebuilding it, I really don't, its just something less to worry about. I'm not sure why he dosn't want to do it.
It adds about $200 to the price of the job, its just silly.

Offline griff

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
  • 65GT Slowback
  • Location: Sutho Shire
  • Name: griff
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #122 on: June 12, 2015, 10:10:32 pm »
I did talk to him about it but felt my knowledge wasn't up to scratch

Compact while i do feel sorry for your lack of knowledge, which will come with time, youve really got to grow some balls mate.
once your engine is done you wont be his customer again nor on his Christmas card list. youre the one spending the money so act accordingly with all of the overwhelming advice.
i'll say it again, grow some balls son.   :toetapping:
when a 3 month engine rebuild turns into 3 year bare metal resto.
you get that .....

Offline Ford Compact 1963

  • Worked
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
  • I'm new here
  • Location: NSW
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #123 on: June 12, 2015, 10:19:01 pm »
Compact while i do feel sorry for your lack of knowledge, which will come with time, youve really got to grow some balls mate.
once your engine is done you wont be his customer again nor on his Christmas card list. youre the one spending the money so act accordingly with all of the overwhelming advice.
i'll say it again, grow some balls son.   :toetapping:

I got balls trust me in what I know. I hear you griff I do I'm just hoping his advice and build is what it's supposed to be. I'm hoping to post up specs tomorrow and picture of completed build... I don't want engine out again  :ouch:

Offline birdman

  • Blue Printed
  • ****
  • Posts: 1440
  • Location: Sydney
  • Name: John
Re: 260 Windsor Rebuild
« Reply #124 on: June 12, 2015, 10:30:22 pm »
If it was my engine I would have done it ( hardened seats ) . Anyway to late now and if the valves are good etc it will be fine as long as its not a Dailey driver . I wouldn't bother will additive unless you drive on a real long trip , 200 Klms  plus at one time then I would put some in . Why did he say 98 fuel surely 95 will be ok unless it has high compression ,ask him what the compression ratio is . It will be fine and good luck with the rest of your venture  :thumb: .

 :agree:  :agree:  :agree: with Glenn
While I'm at it is he fitting a one piece rear main seal or two piece? If he (the builder) doesn't know how to fit the 2 piece seal properly it WILL leak.