Thanks Jas, a well thought out response and one that I will take note of and will certainly be part of the overall review that is being undertaken by the various State Executive Committees.
I have as much information as others on that point so I guess I am entitled to voice my opinion just as much as anyone else here.
Firstly, I think at the beginning of this thread there was advice that the State Execs have till some time in June to come back. We need to allow that to happen.
2 the banner adds - across the top and bottom can be very lucrative to MOCA. I would suggest a minimum 5 or 10 grand PA and might be five or ten times that amount given the volume of traffic on the site. That will mean probably a Shannons or LSV or similar size enterprise taking up the sponsorship. That certainly pays a lot of our costs of running the site and the Forum.
3 We are also fortunate enough to have good membership support and therefore perhaps not so hungry for the dollar. Personally I would rather see NO advertisements. I would cop the banner ads but turn my nose up on the pop ups and similar annoying things that can occur - we simply do not need the antagonism of such items.
4 Without the forum members, this place will not exist so, the members have the loudest voice when it comes to what happens here (that is my view).
5 There are some members here who do/did slip an add in their signature but offered advice freely, without expectation of reward and were quite legitimate in their support of the forum. There were others that managed to be continual posters designed to get their name before members on every occasion possible and I did find them to be nearly as bad as pop ups.
I ask the question as to how to differentiate between them, promote the first type and bury the second type?? I do not agree with a charge being levied. Perhaps we just accept both of the types - with a proviso that those advertisements in the signature area do not carry a graphic and they must be a MOCA member (my thoughts and I may be shouted down).
6 Yes, we had everyone remove their adverts - simply because it was against the rules and those that did advertise were doing so without permission. Maybe a trivial thing but to those that did obey the rules, it was totally unfair. Hence, a review of advertising rules being undertaken now.
Great to have input from members, keep it coming.
Thanks.
Phil